DECISION INTELLIGENCE PLATFORM

A decision you can defend six months from now.

The record is built to be verified by anyone who picks it up. Evidence locked at the source. Approval on the record. Outcomes tracked against what was projected.

Test a Real DecisionWatch the Demo

A flag surfaces on the dashboard. The business needs to decide what to do about it. The discussion moves to emails, meetings, and spreadsheets. The evidence behind the flag gets separated from the call, and the reasoning can be difficult to trace. Six months later, when someone asks why the decision was made, the record may not exist.

From signal to decision brief.

The watch.

The platform watches every number the operation tracks, continuously. When a number moves from where it should be, the change surfaces with its supporting evidence, how certain the read is, and what could be skewing it.

The platform watches for six types of changes:

Variance

Is the number different from what we expected?

Trend

Is it moving in a particular direction?

Anomaly

Is something unusual happening?

Goal Risk

Are we likely to miss a target?

Correlation

Are two numbers moving together?

Seasonality

Is this part of a recurring pattern?

AI is what makes the continuous watch possible. The infrastructure that monitors every number the operation tracks runs on it. The forward deployed analyst reviews what surfaces and publishes the flags that matter, each with context and a path forward.

The brief.

When a flag calls for a decision, it becomes a decision brief. The analyst writes the brief. The platform enforces what it must contain.

On the demo tenant, a correlation insight surfaces. Total Billed Revenue and Fulfillment Revenue are moving together, with a correlation of 0.960 across 11 observations. That insight becomes a decision brief: the analyst adds context, a recommendation, and the caveats. The platform locks the evidence, runs the validations, and records who owns the call.

Predien platform showing a correlation insight on the demo tenant

The brief is not finished when the analyst writes it. Eight controls stand between the brief and the executive.

What the brief enforces.

01

Evidence is frozen.

The moment an insight enters a decision brief, the numbers are captured at the source. The data on the brief is locked. It cannot be edited, backdated, or overwritten. Six months later, the numbers on the record are the numbers that were there at the time.

02

Each number has a source.

Calculated values trace to their components. Components trace to source rows. Any number on the brief can be verified against the original system that produced it. The drill-down is available to anyone with access to the brief.

03

Every validation carries its result.

Each automated validation on the brief shows whether it ran, what it found, and its supporting evidence. If a validation cannot run, the brief says so.

04

Scenario impact comes from the model.

The comparison on the brief comes from the stored scenario results. The numbers cannot be entered manually.

05

Recommendations and caveats are required.

The analyst records the recommendation. Known limitations are visible before approval. If there are no known caveats, that is recorded too.

06

Expected outcomes are recorded.

Before approval, the brief records what the team expects to happen and when the result will be reviewed.

07

Every decision has an owner.

The brief records who recommended the decision, who approved it, and when the outcome will be reviewed.

08

Your systems stay untouched.

The platform reads from the operation's systems. It records the decision without changing the ERP, workforce management, billing, or other source systems. Analyst proposals enter a queue and require the executive's explicit approval before the recommendation moves forward.

Predien decision brief showing frozen evidence, validation results, and approval status

The work can be verified independently at every step. Every number, every brief, and every recommendation meets these controls before an executive acts on it.

After the decision.

The decision record stays live after approval. The expected outcome and the review date are recorded before approval, alongside the evidence and reasoning that informed the call.

When the review date arrives, the platform places the actual outcome next to what was projected. The executive sees the gap. That gap is recorded on the same decision record: what was expected, what happened, how far apart they landed.

The gap feeds the next cycle. It also feeds any future review of the original decision. The record shows what was projected, what happened, and what was learned.

When conditions shift enough that the original call no longer holds, the flag surfaces through the monitoring cycle. The decision is re-tested on current data. The new brief references the original.

01Exception surfaced
02Option modeled
03Decision made
04Actual result
05Lesson captured

The signals are imperfect. The loop is how they get more reliable. Each outcome recorded sharpens the record the next decision is built on.

See how the record gets built, on your data.

Start with the decision the operation is weighing right now. A forward deployed analyst works the data for four weeks. The first decision goes through every control on this page: evidence frozen, approval recorded, outcome tracked.

Test a Real Decision